Justin Parmenter: Fearless and Committed Candidate, NCAE Board of Directors Region 3

It was May 16, 2018.  We had waited in line outside the Legislative Building for hours before finally getting inside the House chamber, and I can still feel the goosebumps on my arms as the teacher chants of “Remember, remember, we vote in November!!” were so loud that the Speaker of the House Tim Moore had to stop talking and wait for us to finish.  We were so powerful that day.

May 16, 2018 was my first full day of membership in NCAE.  I had officially joined the day before when it dawned on me after a couple of years of advocacy work that the best path to winning the schools we all deserve was to be organized and strategic on a large scale–to be a part of a team.

I’m very excited to announce my candidacy for Region 3 Director for the North Carolina Association of Educators.  Please allow me to introduce myself to our members and explain why I feel I deserve your support.

I’m in my 25th year as an English teacher and have been in North Carolina since 2002, having started at James Martin Middle School that year.  Since 2006, I’ve been teaching 7th grade Language Arts at Waddell Academy, a Charlotte Mecklenburg magnet school.

In 2016, I got a fellowship with Hope Street Group’s North Carolina Teacher Voice Network, an organization that trained teachers on how education policy works in our state and how to have a stronger impact on it.  Through that experience, I learned about the power of writing and speaking up to inform the public about the struggles educators and students face and to pressure decision makers to do better. I started showing up regularly at Board of Education meetings and speaking on issues that were important to me and my students like increasing support for our immigrant students and approaching the school district’s equity issues with a sense of urgency.

That work also connected me with some incredible education advocates from all over the state, and I found myself on the Advisory Board of Red4EdNC, an organization of deeply engaged educators that works tirelessly on improving conditions for our public schools.  I began to learn that waiting for our policy makers to do the right thing was foolish, and that the change was going to have to come from the bottom up.

In May of 2018, as multiple schools districts began to close ahead of the Rally for Respect, it became clear to me that NCAE had real power in North Carolina and offered the best avenue to making those changes a reality.  I decided I wanted to be a part of the team.

In 2019, I was present at the NCAE Convention as a Charlotte Mecklenburg Association of Educators delegate when our members voted overwhelmingly to hold the May 1 Day of Action.  The energy when we made that decision and when we felt the love and support of our governor was absolutely amazing.

Having seen the local impact my writing could have on important issues like expanding our education budget and bringing trauma awareness to our schools, I joined the May 1 Communications team to help prepare for the rally.  My goal was to bring the struggles educators and our public school families face into the public view and push back against the lies coming out of the General Assembly. 

I laid out our five Day of Action demands for EdNC and the Washington Post and drew the attention of the most powerful politician in North Carolina, Senator Phil Berger, as you can see below:

For the past few months I’ve been using my website Notes from the Chalkboard to report on the Istation controversy and make sure folks are aware of Superintendent Mark Johnson’s shady dealings in awarding Istation a multimillion dollar contract against the advice of actual educators.  Recently, I broke the related story of the Department of Public Instruction’s alleged spying on a retired director’s personal text messages, and I’m organizing pressure on DPI to release relevant information so the people responsible for this unethical behavior can be held accountable.

My work on Istation earned me legal threats in the form of a Cease and Desist notice from the corporation’s attorneys which is now displayed proudly with my other certificates, diplomas and awards, a reminder to be fearless and committed.  

This school year I’ve committed to getting more involved with my local, attending CMAE meetings and serving on CMAE’s Government Relations Committee, helping conduct interviews with candidates for office to determine endorsements.  

It’s important for me to acknowledge that, even though I am not new to organizing or education advocacy, I am still relatively new to NCAE.  My biggest area for growth is in continuing to build relationships in all of Region 3 (a region including Anson, Cabarrus, Gaston, Kannapolis, Lincoln, Charlotte/Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Mooresville City, Rowan, Stanly, and Union Counties).  I am deeply committed to doing just that.  

On the other hand, I will bring a fresh perspective and new energy to the work.  I believe that the key to educators in Region 3 being effectively organized comes down to detailed policy knowledge paired with strong and consistent communication.  As Region 3 Director, I will keep close tabs on policy issues that impact all of our member counties (not just Mecklenburg County) and provide regular updates for members on specific opportunities to win improvements for our public schools at both the local and state levels

Together we will build all of Region 3 into a force to be reckoned with.

Things are slowly improving in North Carolina, but there is so much left to do, and 2020 is going to be a really critical year.  

Please consider giving me the opportunity to serve our organization as Director for Region 3 and encouraging others to do the same.

Thank you,

Justin Parmenter
Charlotte, NC

NC Superintendent Mark Johnson mocks improper surveillance accusations with references to ninjas and “DPI Spy Squad”

In a Friday morning radio interview, State Superintendent Mark Johnson mocked allegations that someone at the Department of Public Instruction improperly monitored the personal text messages of former K-3 Literacy Director Carolyn Guthrie.

A screenshot of a text message sent by Guthrie is at the center of a months-long controversy over North Carolina’s K-3 reading assessment. The allegations hold that Guthrie neglected to unsync text message forwarding on her DPI-issued Apple laptop when she retired in September 2017 and that someone at DPI intercepted a text message she sent in January 2019. That text message was used by Johnson as grounds for cancelling a multimillion-dollar procurement process.

Kathryn-Johnston-Affidavit-Text-Message

In the interview, Johnson mockingly referred to “my elite squad of ninjas” and “my DPI Spy Team” before claiming the accusations were nothing more than “the media and the bureaucracy just trying to throw anything they can at me and hoping it sticks.”

Dozens of people have filed public records requests this week for electronic device inventory logs which could help clarify who had Guthrie’s laptop after she retired.

You can hear Johnson’s comments below:


Let’s get to the bottom of the Department of Public Instruction’s Spygate

Last night I published a story about allegations that the Department of Public Instruction spied on the personal text messages of former K-3 Literacy Director Carolyn Guthrie for more than 16 months after her September 2017 retirement from the department.

Screenshots of a text message between Guthrie and another retired DPI employee mysteriously appeared in Superintendent Mark Johnson’s denial of a protest of his contract award to Istation and later in a sworn affidavit by one of Johnson’s deputies.

Kathryn-Johnston-Affidavit-Text-Message

According to the allegations, when Carolyn Guthrie retired, she neglected to log out of Text Message Forwarding on her DPI-issued Apple laptop. The laptop continued to have access to text messages sent from and received on Guthrie’s personal iPhone from her September 2017 retirement until at least January 8, 2019 when the text message was intercepted.

On Wednesday evening, DPI Communications Director Graham Wilson told WRAL, “”We do not know where the text message came from. We are conducting an investigation to try to find out.”

Considering DPI has had that text message for about a year, I’m a little skeptical that getting to the bottom of Spygate is all of a sudden a huge priority. In order to help DPI in its investigation, I have filed the following public records request for electronic device inventory numbers for people who worked for DPI’s K-3 Literacy Department during the months in question (it seems unlikely devices would have been reassigned outside that department):

Dear Mr. Wilson,

Under North Carolina Public Records Law, G.S. §132-1, I am requesting an opportunity to inspect or obtain copies of the following records:

Fixed asset inventory numbers for any electronic devices assigned by the Department of Public Instruction (including but not limited to MacBook Air laptops, MacBook Pro laptops, iPads, and iMac desktop computers) between August 31, 2017 and March 31, 2019 to the following individuals:

Carolyn Guthrie
Karla Casteen
Pam Shue
Mary Hutchings
Tara Galloway
Paul Schmidt

And any or all other employees of the DPI K-3 Literacy Department during that date range.

As you know, the law requires that you respond to and fulfill this request “as promptly as possible.” If you expect a significant delay in responding to and fulfilling this request, please contact me with information about when I might expect copies or the ability to inspect the requested records.

If you deny any or all of this request, please cite each specific exemption you feel justifies the refusal to release the information and notify me of the appeal procedures available to me under the law. 

Thanks in advance for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Justin Parmenter

Snooping on the personal communications of a retired employee is a grossly unethical and possibly criminal action. It would be naive to trust that a Department of Public Instruction that would take a personal text message, not question where it came from, and use it to cancel a multimillion dollar reading assessment procurement will now do its due diligence in finding the person or people responsible.

If you’d like to aid in the investigation, you can submit your own public records request for the inventory numbers at the link below:

NC DPI Public Records Request Form

Explosive new Istation allegation: Department of Public Instruction spied on retired director

Explosive new allegations were revealed by Amplify’s attorney at this week’s hearing on the Istation contract: A text message at the center of the months-long controversy was intercepted by DPI staff who used the laptop of the former Director of K-3 Literacy to monitor her personal communications for more than a year after her retirement.  

Carolyn Guthrie served as K-3 Literacy Director from December 2012 to September 2017, working the last several months of her tenure under Johnson.  Guthrie had her DPI-issued laptop synced with her personal cell phone so she could read text messages on her computer, and when she retired she apparently neglected to unsync the phone before turning her laptop in to IT.  As with any such organization, the Department of Public Instruction has a policy that devices of departing employees must be wiped clean. DPI reportedly did not follow that policy with Carolyn Guthrie’s laptop in September of 2017.

On January 8, 2019, Superintendent Mark Johnson called a meeting with the evaluation committee which was working on a recommendation for a K-3 reading assessment.  Johnson had spent a month digesting a proposal made by the team in early December that ranked Amplify Education’s mClass product an overwhelming first.

At the meeting, Johnson commented about the importance of freeing up more time for teachers to teach and the need to provide them with the right tools.  The superintendent then asked the 10 voting members present to vote for a second time and stepped out of the room “to maintain integrity of the process.”  

After the superintendent exited the room, team members wrote their choices on sticky notes, and the project manager tallied the results.  Amplify again easily came out on top, with six people recommending negotiations proceed with Amplify only, three with Istation only, and one voting that negotiations continue with both companies. 

RFP-meeting-January-8-with-Mark-Johnson

Here’s where the text message comes in.  Later the same day, a text message conversation occurred between Carolyn Guthrie and another former DPI employee occurred, apparently based on information provided by a member of the evaluation committee who was present at the meeting with Mark Johnson.

Below is a transcript of that conversation:

Well, just got off another call with AW 1 hour 45 minutes all about RFP.  What a mess!

Geez!  What is going on?

MJ came into their voting meeting today to basically (without coming directly out and specifying) tell them how to vote!  However the vote did not go his way so it will be interesting to see how he gets his way on this.

OMG!  I know they were shocked!

Yep, she said they walked out of the building and several people said what just happened?

Someone, AW should have recorded it on her phone!

She thought about it, but her phone was lying on the table in front of everyone

Oh yeah, that would have been tough…who else was in the room?  Have they named a replacement for Amy J?

RB. She and RB and Cindy Dewey and Lynne Loeser and Kristy Day and Susan Laney voted for children.  Pam, Chloe and one of Mark’s staff voted for helping teachers. She said he talked about helping teachers and never once mentioned children and saving the teachers time.  

Ass

The sad thing is, he may win his next race because he will talk about how he helped teachers!

Well that’s why he’s pushing this.  Children can’t VOTE so we appease lazy ass teachers.

Exactly!

Two months after this meeting, Johnson had his General Counsel inform the team that the procurement process would be cancelled due to an unspecified confidentiality breach and the team’s failure to achieve unanimous consensus.  Johnson then assembled a new, smaller evaluation committee which included his close advisors but was almost entirely devoid of educators or subject matter experts with relevant experience.  The new committee recommended Istation instead of mClass, and in June 2019 Johnson awarded Istation the contract.

The existence of the text message wasn’t made public until Superintendent Johnson issued his official response denying Amplify’s protest of the contract award at the end of July 2019.  In the response, Johnson said “a whistleblower provided evidence of a text message discussion detailing how committee members had voted…” and he framed this breach of confidentiality as part of his grounds for cancelling the procurement process.  

In the supporting Exhibits for Amplify Protest Decision, this redacted screenshot version of the text message was provided:

The next major development around the text message occurred in October of 2019, when Mark Johnson’s Deputy Superintendent for Operations Kathryn Johnston filed a sworn affidavit as a part of the ongoing review of the procurement process by the Department of Information Technology.  In the affidavit, Johnston revealed the identity of the individual who had leaked details of the January 8 2019 meeting as Abbey Whitford, a K-3 literacy consultant who had served on the evaluation committee, and the individuals communicating in the text message as Carolyn Guthrie and another former DPI literacy consultant, Anne Evans.  

An unredacted screenshot of the text message appeared in Johnston’s affidavit:

Kathryn-Johnston-Affidavit-Text-Message

This time Guthrie’s inbox is visible, and the screenshot displays several days of messages from January 2019, presumably from friends and family.  

The lone media report about the October affidavit repeated Mark Johnson’s July language and again referred to the text message as having been provided by “a whistleblower,” but it’s interesting to note that Kathryn Johnston’s affidavit, made under oath, does not include this language.  Rather, Johnston simply says that she has been made aware of the text message:

According to the allegations, here’s how the Department of Public Instruction really got its hands on the personal text message between two former employees:

Guthrie had Text Message Forwarding set up on her DPI-issued Apple laptop, enabling her to read and write iMessages from her personal iPhone on the computer.  When she retired in 2017 and turned the computer back in to DPI’s IT department, she forgot to log out of the feature.  

At the time of Guthrie’s departure, her laptop should have been completely purged and refreshed to prepare it for the next user as per usual procedure.  DPI allegedly neglected to follow that policy, and for at least 16 months after her retirement, unknown individuals at the Department of Public Instruction had access to Carolyn Guthrie’s personal text message communications.  

It’s impossible to say how much spying occurred during this time.  However, the screenshot–and lack of explanation for how DPI came to have Guthrie’s personal text message–lends credence to the allegation that Guthrie’s communication was being actively monitored.

If individuals at DPI were in fact intercepting the text messages of a former employee, it will be interesting to see what laws may apply to this activity.  

North Carolina’s statute on interception of electronic communication, § 15A-287, is a “one party consent” law.  It states that, without the consent of at least one person involved in the communication, it is a Class H felony if a person “Willfully intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication.”  

Note that § 15A-287 ends with the following:

Any public officer who shall violate subsection (a) or (d) of this section or who shall knowingly violate subsection (e) of this section shall be removed from any public office he may hold and shall thereafter be ineligible to hold any public office, whether elective or appointed. 

In the event that this alleged spying does not fall under North Carolina wiretapping law, hopefully we can at least all agree that it’s incredibly unethical and shameful to knowingly monitor personal communications of former employees.  If someone at DPI was simply negligent and forgot to wipe the laptop clean, the moment it was discovered that Carolyn Guthrie’s personal text messages were still syncing to the device, it should have been purged and she should have been notified.  

Instead, the text message at the center of the Istation controversy was allegedly intercepted by someone in the department and provided to Superintendent Mark Johnson who then used it as a reason for cancelling the K-3 reading assessment procurement process at the very moment when it was going overwhelmingly in Amplify’s favor.

Regardless of whether Johnson was personally involved in conducting surveillance on a former employee, he is ultimately responsible for what happens at the Department of Public Instruction.

Department of Information Technology threatens to block Mark Johnson’s emergency Istation purchase

In a tersely worded memo sent to the Department of Public Instruction today, NC Department of Information Technology Chief Procurement Officer Patti Bowers warned that the state’s Chief Information Officer could exercise his statutory authority to “cancel or suspend any information technology procurement that occurs without the State CIO’s approval.”

The memo referred to Superintendent Mark Johnson’s $928,570 “emergency purchase” of the controversial online reading assessment Istation made late Tuesday night.

Emergency purchases require authorization of the CIO with few exceptions. One of those exceptions is if they “must be made outside normal business hours.”

In the memo, DIT noted that “If every contract signed after business hours constituted an emergency, the term would be rendered meaningless.”

Johnson has until 10 AM on Tuesday, January 14 to provide satisfactory responses to the following questions. If he fails to respond, or if the responses provided are not satisfactory, it appears likely the state CIO could well intervene and cancel the Istation purchase:

1. Why was prior verbal approval not obtained and why was it necessary to execute the RFQ after business hours? Please supply copies of emails, notes, and native documents together with associated metadata or similar records.

2. What are the specific emergency event(s) that constitute the “recent circumstances endanger[ing] the continuation of Read to Achieve (“RtA”)” as referenced in the “Emergency Purchase-RtA Reading Diagnostic Assessment” dated January 7, 2020?

3. Clarify the costs associated with the RFQ and compare those costs to the costs proposed in the original contract in order to determine if there are any discrepancies.

4. The RFQ presents two payments which appear to be installments and are not aligned with the costs presented. Describe the services and term for Phase I with a payment due date of 1/15/2020 and Phase II with a payment due date of 3/15/2020.

5. Do the costs for either Phase I or Phase II include payment for services rendered under the “no cost” Memorandum of Agreement executed August 27, 2019, and expiring December 31, 2019? Provide documentation that the “no cost” services were received and accepted without further obligation by either party

You can read the memo in its entirety below:

NCDIT-Emergency-Purchase-response-1.10.2020


Emergency Istation purchase may have violated NC’s administrative code

A contract signed late Tuesday night between Superintendent Mark Johnson and Istation may have violated North Carolina’s administrative code governing technology procurements.  Those rules require approval of the state’s Chief Information Officer for such an emergency purchase except under very specific conditions–conditions which may not have been met.

On Tuesday, a Wake County Superior Court judge declined to intervene in the ongoing contract dispute between Amplify and Istation on behalf of the Department of Public Instruction (DPI).  DPI had petitioned to have the court lift a contract stay put in place by the Department of Information (DIT) while DIT reviews the controversial process Johnson followed in awarding Istation an $8.3 million contract.

The ruling was issued before 11:00 AM, as you can see on this tweet by Education NC’s Liz Bell:

The judge’s decision briefly left schools without access to a K-3 reading assessment as required by Read to Achieve legislation.  

Almost exactly twelve hours later (10:36 pm according to the time stamp on the contract), Johnson inked an emergency purchase of Istation for $928,570.

In unusually late-night email to school districts sent immediately thereafter, Johnson explained that he had just made an emergency purchase as allowed under state procurement rule 09 NCAC 06B .1302 to ensure schools could meet legal requirements on testing.

Here’s the $928,570 question:  Why was Mark Johnson conducting this business at such a late hour?  Wouldn’t Tuesday afternoon have been a great time for it? Better yet, wouldn’t a government agency conducting itself prudently have come up with a contingency plan well in advance of the judge’s Tuesday morning decision, knowing schools would need to administer tests the next day?

The answer to that question may lie in the procurement rule Johnson cited:

09 NCAC 06B .1302 EMERGENCY SITUATIONS OR PRESSING NEED

(a) An agency may make purchases of goods or services in the open market in cases of emergency or pressing need. (b) When emergency or pressing need action is necessary, and the estimated expenditure is over the purchasing agency’s delegation, prior verbal approval shall be obtained from the State CIO unless the purchase must be made outside of business hours, during holidays or when state offices are otherwise closed. Subsequently, if the expenditure is over the purchasing agency’s delegation, an explanation of the emergency or pressing need purchase shall be reported in writing to the State CIO.

Note that permission for an emergency purchase such as the one Mark Johnson made requires approval of the Chief Information Officer unless “the purchase must be made outside of business hours, during holidays or when state offices are otherwise closed.”  

The key word here is must.  Why was it this purchase couldn’t be made during business hours?  Why didn’t Mark Johnson seek approval of the CIO in purchasing Istation?

This is probably a good time to mention that North Carolina’s Chief Information Officer happens to be Eric Boyette, head of the Department of Information Technology–the same agency which issued the stay of the Istation contract to begin with.  

The amount of the emergency Istation contract may also be significant.  According to State Board of Education policy, “Any contractual obligation that would result in an expenditure of [$1 M] or more requires the approval of the SBE.”  That same State Board grilled Johnson about the purchase at Wednesday’s monthly meeting during a tense exchange which made it seem unlikely the board would have approved such a move.  Since the Istation price tag came in 71K under the threshold mandated in board policy, Johnson didn’t need their approval.

On January 13, the Department of Information Technology’s administrative hearing on the procurement process Johnson followed with Istation is set to begin.  The hearing officer is DIT General Counsel Jonathan Shaw, and Mark Johnson has already blasted Shaw for “the incompetence with which he has conducted this review process.”  

Get your popcorn ready.

Superintendent Mark Johnson defies DIT contract stay, spends nearly $1 million on Istation

Late last night, NC Superintendent Mark Johnson notified school districts that he had just made an “emergency purchase” with Istation so that schools could continue using the controversial K-3 reading assessment.

In the email, Johnson explained that the move would enable schools to comply with the state’s Read to Achieve legislation after a district court judge declined to intervene on DPI’s behalf in the ongoing legal battle.

The email didn’t say that Johnson had just put nearly $1 million in Istation’s pockets for three months access to the online reading test.  It also didn’t mention that the purchase defies a stay issued by the Department of Information Technology which had blocked implementation of the Istation contract while that department–which has authority over state technology procurements–reviews the controversial process Johnson followed in awarding it.  

Johnson’s argument is that, in purchasing Istation, he is simply following the Read to Achieve law, which requires that students in grades K-3 “shall be assessed with valid, reliable, formative, and diagnostic reading assessments.”   However, it’s important to note that there are free reading assessments available that have already been approved by the State Board of Education which could be used while the Istation contract is reviewed.

Another alternative could have been for Istation to extend the Memorandum of Agreement it had crafted with DPI to allow North Carolina schools to continue using its product for free while it awaits a final ruling.

At any rate, Istation no longer has to wait for its cheddar, as Johnson’s emergency purchase spends $928,570 taxpayer dollars for access to the computer-based reading test from now through the end of March.

As long as we’re making emergency purchases, I know some social studies teachers who would love to have new textbooks so their students don’t have to keep drawing pictures of the last decade’s presidents…

You can review the emergency purchase document in its entirety below:

Istation-Emergency-Purchase

Leandro report calls for return of thousands of K-3 teaching assistants cut by state legislators

Last month the much-anticipated Leandro report was made public.  The report is the result of a comprehensive, year-long study by non-partisan education consultants WestEd who were appointed by North Carolina courts to take a systematic look at whether or not the state is living up to its constitutional mandate to provide a “sound basic education” to each child.

Spoiler alert–it isn’t.

It’s important to understand that the WestEd’s Leandro report is not so much a progress report as a detailed road map toward compliance for state legislators.  

Any K-3 teacher will tell you how hard it is to manage behaviors and differentiate instruction for a large group of early elementary students with only one adult in the classroom.  Yet in the last decade in North Carolina we’ve seen our numbers of teaching assistants reduced by more than 8,500, the vast majority of them state-funded positions.  

Over the same decade we’ve lost those thousands of teaching assistants, student enrollment in North Carolina schools has increased by 12%.  

One of the recommendations made in the Leandro report is that North Carolina “fully fund teaching assistants in the early grades (K–3) to ensure adequate student-to-staff ratios for fostering responsive relationships and effective instruction.”

Returning the thousands of teaching assistants who have fallen victim to budget cuts over the last decade is going to be a vital step toward providing students with the education guaranteed to them in our constitution.  

Sound-Basic-Education-for-All-An-Action-Plan-for-North-Carolina


Hey teachers! This holiday season, give yourself the gift of a real break

Few phrases ring sweeter to the classroom teacher’s ear than the words ‘Winter Break.’  But for many, the anticipation of two weeks off competes with anxiety over a lengthy To Do list.  What about the lessons that need planning, the thick stack of essays that needs grading? Surely it couldn’t hurt to bring home just a little bit of work for when the break gets boring.

That’s how it starts.  Unfortunately, all too often that ‘little bit of work’ turns into hours and hours of school-related duties completed off the clock at the expense of friends, family, and, most of all, yourself.

The expense may be higher than you realize.  According to a 2018 University of Pennsylvania study, 44.6% of teachers quit within the first five years of their career.  The relatively high attrition rate for beginning teachers has been holding steady since the 1980s.

The study also found that the number one reason given by teachers who leave is dissatisfaction with school and working conditions.  Those conditions include a variety of factors such as low salaries, classroom resources, student behavior, and school leadership.  They also include workload.  

Unreasonable workloads are often imposed by others, but as teachers we regularly impose them upon ourselves as well.  Taking on more than we should is driven by a desire to help that child who is three grade levels behind in reading to catch up as much as possible in the one year we have with them.  By the understanding that detailed, personalized feedback is the best way to improve student writing. By the fervent belief that our own hard work is the most important key to opening doors of opportunity for the children we serve.

The intense pressure we place on ourselves is a recipe for burnout if we don’t couple it with healthy boundaries and regular, intentional self care.  

So this holiday season, please say no to the To Do list and give yourself the much-deserved gift of a real break.  Leave those papers on your desk where they belong. Delete your school email account from your phone. Go out for drinks with your friends, and sleep til 10 the next day.  Take that hot yoga class you’ve always wondered about. Instead of brushing up on the latest pedagogy, read a book that has nothing to do with education.  

Take time to completely unplug from your professional life without the slightest pang of conscience, believing to your core that what you accomplish during school hours is absolutely enough.

Because taking care of yourself is essential to a long and successful teaching career.

The most important learning isn’t measured by standardized tests

a sampling of my students’ work

As Winter Break approaches, students in my 7th grade Language Arts classes are wrapping up work on their second quarter projects.  They have spent more than three weeks writing short stories about a picture they each chose from the Chris Van Allsburg book The Mysteries of Harris Burdick

During that time they have learned the following things:

  • Strategies for opening hooks
  • How to write vivid descriptions using sensory details
  • How to develop dynamic characters
  • Effective plot structure including resolution of conflicts and tricks like flash forwards and flashbacks
  • Tense shifts and how to avoid them
  • How to write and punctuate dialogue correctly
  • How to use online tools to create visual storyboards

Students have participated in peer editing and learned to give targeted feedback that builds their classmate’s writing up without making them feel small.  That exercise has helped us to create a more positive classroom culture and strengthen the relationships that form the foundation of everything we do in class.

The stories reflect the individuality of my students themselves and are anything but standardized.  They run the gamut from historical fiction to romance to fantasy to horror and everything in between.  One of them includes a demonic platypus, and another explores the meaning behind the magical sunglasses from the 80s cult classic science fiction film They Live.  

Over the past month I have watched students come alive through unbridled creativity. I’ve seen children with learning disabilities work twice as hard as their non-disabled peers to make their brilliant story ideas come to fruition in print.  I have watched writers, unprompted, conduct research for their projects so that they can add authentic details and make their stories richer. I’ve been blown away by the deep level of engagement I’ve seen in them all.

My intent is not to boast, as this type of profound learning occurs in countless classrooms around the country every single day.  Rather, I bring it up to make a larger point.

Much of what my 149 students have gained while working on this story project will not be measured on our standardized tests.  It won’t be reflected at all in the data which is supposed to capture successful teaching and learning in our schools.

But I guarantee that for the majority of them it will be the learning experience that has the biggest impact on them in 7th grade English.  This project has shown my students how their writing can shine when they are hardworking and intentional, and it’s my belief that the lessons they have learned will shape their approach to writing in the future.

I’ve been talking with a lot of colleagues lately about the urgent need to reimagine how we gauge the success of our teachers and schools.  Besides just plain getting it wrong, our current measures serve, intentionally or not, to drive a privatization agenda that starves our public schools of the resources they so desperately need.  In North Carolina, those measures include “value-added” EVAAS ratings for teachers as well as school report card grades that assign an A-F letter to each school based on students’ ability to answer multiple choice questions.

The WestEd Leandro report which was released last week calls for the same change over and over:  a broadening of our definitions of school progress to incorporate other important indicators which are currently ignored.  

I believe that most educators want to be evaluated on more than just their test scores.  That’s not because we want to hide our failures. It’s because teachers want the world to know what we are doing right.